League of Cities of the Philippines v. COMELEC

League of Cities of the Philippines v. COMELEC is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the Philippines about the validity of the cityhood laws of sixteen municipalities in the Philippines. The case clarifies the requirements for the conversion of a Municipality into a Component City. The Court in its final decision ruled that the cityhood laws of the sixteen municipalities in the Philippines are constitutional.

Landmark decision
League of Cities of the Philippines v. COMELEC
Court Supreme Court of the Philippines
Full case name League of Cities of the Philippines v. Commission on Elections[1]
Decided April 12, 2011 (2011-04-12) (final case)
Citation(s) (G.R. Nos. 176951, 177499, and 178056; April 12, 2011)
Case opinions
April 12, 2011 case
Concurring Opinion:Roberto A. Abad
Dissenting Opinion:Antonio Carpio
Dissenting Opinion:Maria Lourdes Sereno
Court membership
Judges sitting Renato Corona(Chief Justice), Antonio Carpio(dissenting), Conchita Carpio-Morales(dissenting), Presbitero Velasco, Antonio Eduardo Nachura(took no part), Teresita de Castro, Arturo Brion(dissenting), Diosdado Peralta(dissenting), Lucas Bersamin, Mariano del Castillo(took no part), Roberto A. Abad, Martin Villarama Jr.(dissenting), Jose Perez, Jose C. Mendoza, Maria Lourdes Sereno(dissenting)
Case opinions
Decision by Lucas Bersamin (April 12, 2011 case)

. . . League of Cities of the Philippines v. COMELEC . . .

In the Eleventh Congress, 57 bills seeking the conversion of municipalities into component cities were filed before the House of Representatives. However, Congress did not act on the 24 out of the 57 municipalities. In the Twelfth Congress, Republic Act No. 9009 was enacted revising the Local Government Code (LGC) by increasing the income requirement to qualify for conversion into a city from ₱20 million annual income to ₱100 million locally generated income. In the thirteenth Congress, 16 of the 24 municipalities filed their individual cityhood bills. Each of the cityhood bills contained a common provision exempting the particular municipality from the ₱100 million income requirement imposed by RA No. 9009. These cityhood bills lapsed into law on various dates after President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo did not sign them.

Petitioners filed to declare the Cityhood Laws unconstitutional for violation of Section 10, Article X of the 1987 Constitution, as well as for violation of the equal protection clause. Petitioners also pointed that the wholesale conversion of municipalities into cities will reduce the share of existing cities in the Internal Revenue Allotment (IRA) because more cities will share the same amount of internal revenue set aside for all cities under Section 285 of the Local Government Code.[2]

The municipalities involved were called as “League of 16”. They were:

. . . League of Cities of the Philippines v. COMELEC . . .

This article is issued from web site Wikipedia. The original article may be a bit shortened or modified. Some links may have been modified. The text is licensed under “Creative Commons – Attribution – Sharealike” [1] and some of the text can also be licensed under the terms of the “GNU Free Documentation License” [2]. Additional terms may apply for the media files. By using this site, you agree to our Legal pages . Web links: [1] [2]

. . . League of Cities of the Philippines v. COMELEC . . .

Previous post 2013 Indonesian Masters Grand Prix Gold
Next post 2019–20 Iowa State Cyclones men’s basketball team